[Web-SIG] wsgi.url_vars feedback

[Luke Arno]

On 11/1/06, Ian Bicking <ianb at colorstudy.com> wrote:
> Probably the name I like the most of what you've suggested would be
> "wsgi.routing_args", since that makes me think of "things that were
> captured on the way here" ("routing" more so than "dispatch").
> Actually, I don't really feel any strong difference between args and
> vars, though I suppose now that it's a tuple of positional and named
> values then "args" makes more sense.

I kind of like something with "dispatch" in it but I
don't really care. A brief name would be nice.

path_args
dispatch_args
routing_args
captures
url_captures
path_captures
...

> This would break Luke's quick implementation, but hopefully he won't
> mind.  It hasn't been moved to "accepted" yet, so he was warned ;)

Not a problem at all. I figured as much. :)

- Luke