[Web-SIG] serving (potentially large) files through wsgi?

Chris Withers chris at simplistix.co.uk
Fri Dec 21 15:01:08 CET 2007

Brian Smith wrote:
> It would make more sense for the WSGI specification to explicitly say
> that WSGI gateways are responsible for setting the default logging
> output location.

Yes, although by this I assume you mean "WSGI gateways are responsible 
for allowing configuration of log handlers for the python logging package"

> non-WSGI-aware modules that use the python logging module. The
> specification should then also explicitly say that WSGI applications
> should not redirect logging output to wsgi.errors or anywhere else. 


> In
> fact, if that was done, there would be no reason to have wsgi.errors in
> the first place. 

Exactly ;-)



Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

More information about the Web-SIG mailing list