[Web-SIG] a possible error in the WSGI spec
Manlio Perillo
manlio_perillo at libero.it
Thu Dec 27 10:56:51 CET 2007
Phillip J. Eby ha scritto:
> At 04:15 PM 12/26/2007 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>> On 26/12/2007, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
>> > At 12:28 PM 12/24/2007 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>> > >By the way: isn't it better to first release a WSGI 1.1 before
>> > >jumping to a (incompatible) WSGI 2.0?
>> >
>> > Better for whom, and for what purpose?
>>
>
>[...]
>
> These are good things to have, sure. But this doesn't answer the
> question of why doing that first would be *better* than doing 2.0 first,
> assuming that there is any reason why they can't or shouldn't be worked
> on concurrently.
>
The problem is that WSGI 2.0 does not yet exists; instead WSGI 1.0 has
already been implemented in several different environments so it seems
better to first "complete" WSGI 1.0 (errata, addendum, or 1.1).
Manlio Perillo
More information about the Web-SIG
mailing list