[Web-SIG] a possible error in the WSGI spec
manlio_perillo at libero.it
Thu Dec 27 11:05:11 CET 2007
Phillip J. Eby ha scritto:
> Informally, OTOH, playing with 2.0 prototypes should be pretty
> informative, too.
In my WSGI implementation for Nginx I started with the 2.0 draft, since
the code flow is more simpler.
However, now that I have implemented 1.0, it's a bit hard to add support
Moreover I'm not very interested in 2.0 now, since I want first
experiment with the asynchronous extension for 1.0 (pause_output) to see
if something good can be done with it.
More information about the Web-SIG