[Web-SIG] more comments on Paste Deploy
jim at zope.com
Mon Mar 5 13:05:27 CET 2007
On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Chad Whitacre wrote:
>> Thanks, Jim and Ian, for bringing this discussion online.
>> I have two hesitations with Paste Deploy:
>> 1. The configuration syntax is really complex. I'm much more
>> comfortable with multiple simpler config files.
> Is it really that complex?
I don't think so, otoh, you make some good points. :)
> There's a few too many ways to do middleware
> around applications, I'm afraid.
> get/set is really a rather obscure
> feature that I seldom use.
I don't remember seeing this in the documentation.
> The distinction between "composite" and
> "app" isn't necessary, I think.
> The ability to inherit from sections is really useful IMHO (though not
> well described in documentation); that's where you do something like
> "use = other_section", and then add settings that override that other
> section's settings.
Yes, but the way it is overloaded with selecting an entry point and
referring to another configuration file is confusing. I
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Web-SIG