[Web-SIG] [Proposal] "website" and first-level conf (was: more comments on Paste Deploy)
Jim Fulton
jim at zope.com
Mon Mar 5 21:23:56 CET 2007
On Mar 5, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> wrote:
>> We don't deploy to win32 and I don't know enough about win32 to
>> answer. I expect though that, like Unix, a production deployment is
>> going to look different than a development buildout. In any case,
>> I'm pretty sure that the classic unix-mimicing layout has no
>> advantages for win32. :)
>
> Well, it is something that needs to be considered though. We can't
> just close one eye and pretend that win32 does not exist.
I wasn't suggesting we shouldn't consider it. I just don't think
win32 will change my opinion of what I think about a unix-inspired
instance layout.
Someone should think about windows who actually uses it. I am not a
windows server administrator, so I can't suggest how deploying
applications on windows servers would effect file placement or layout.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Web-SIG
mailing list