[Web-SIG] [Proposal] "website" and first-level conf (was: more comments on Paste Deploy)

Jim Fulton jim at zope.com
Mon Mar 5 21:23:56 CET 2007

On Mar 5, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:

> On 3/5/07, Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> wrote:
>> We don't deploy to win32 and I don't know enough about win32 to
>> answer.  I expect though that, like Unix, a production deployment is
>> going to look different than a development buildout.  In any case,
>> I'm pretty sure that the classic unix-mimicing layout has no
>> advantages for win32. :)
> Well, it is something that needs to be considered though. We can't
> just close one eye and pretend that win32 does not exist.

I wasn't suggesting we shouldn't consider it.  I just don't think  
win32 will change my opinion of what I think about a unix-inspired  
instance layout.

Someone should think about windows who actually uses it.  I am not a  
windows server administrator, so I can't suggest how deploying  
applications on windows servers would effect file placement or layout.


Jim Fulton			mailto:jim at zope.com		Python Powered!
CTO 				(540) 361-1714			http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation	http://www.zope.com		http://www.zope.org

More information about the Web-SIG mailing list