[Web-SIG] Proposal: Avoiding Serialization When Stacking Middleware
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Tue Mar 13 22:38:44 CET 2007
At 04:15 PM 3/13/2007 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>At 03:14 PM 3/13/2007 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>>>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>>>>I didn't understand what you were proposing, I think. I still don't
>>>>>really know what get_file_storage means.
>>>>It would return a cgi.file_storage encoding the request body.
>>>
>>>I still don't understand. Are you talking about cgi.FieldStorage?
>>Oops. Yeah. That should be get_field_storage(), then. D'oh. Sorry
>>about that. Obviously it's been a while since I've used one of thos
>>directly. :)
>
>OK, we're getting closer, but I'm *still* not entirely sure what you are
>proposing. Are you talking about adding a function to wsgiref that either
>parses the input with cgi.FieldStorage, or gets an existing parsed value?
I was talking about defining a standard WSGI extension whereby the
wsgi.input object could have such a method.
More information about the Web-SIG
mailing list