[Web-SIG] [extension] x-wsgiorg.flush
chrism at plope.com
Thu Oct 4 17:55:44 CEST 2007
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 05:00 PM 10/4/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>> Your are making a critical decision here.
>> You are lowering the level of WSGI to match the level of average WSGI
>> middlewares programmers.
> No, we're just getting rid of legacy cruft that's hard to support
> correctly. There's a big difference.
Getting the start_response dance down and understanding how it plays
with middleware is *hard*. Even if we called it something other than
WSGI 2.0 (which I don't think we should, because it really is an
evolution), returning the three-tuple is the right thing to do.
More information about the Web-SIG