[Web-SIG] [extension] x-wsgiorg.flush

[Chris McDonough]

On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:

> At 05:00 PM 10/4/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>> Your are making a critical decision here.
>> You are lowering the level of WSGI to match the level of average WSGI
>> middlewares programmers.
>
> No, we're just getting rid of legacy cruft that's hard to support
> correctly.  There's a big difference.

Getting the start_response dance down and understanding how it plays  
with middleware is *hard*.  Even if we called it something other than  
WSGI 2.0 (which I don't think we should, because it really is an  
evolution), returning the three-tuple is the right thing to do.

- C