[Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0
manlio_perillo at libero.it
Thu Oct 4 19:53:45 CEST 2007
Phillip J. Eby ha scritto:
> At 06:58 PM 10/4/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>> But why you are against adding a new environ value (not necessary named
>> wsgi.asynchronous), that will explicitly state if the WSGI server will
>> interleave the WSGI application?
> Why do you think it's useful?
For the same reason you think wsgi.multiprocess is useful.
Its an informative information; maybe it is not really useful, but it
describe how the WSGI server works.
Regards Manlio Perillo
More information about the Web-SIG