[Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Mon Oct 8 13:17:11 CEST 2007
At 01:02 PM 10/8/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>Supporting "legacy" and "huge" WSGI applications is not really a
>priority for me.
Then you should really make it clear to your users that your Nginx
module does not support WSGI. The entire point of WSGI is to allow
"legacy" (i.e. already-written applications) to be portable across
servers. Something that doesn't run existing WSGI apps is clearly not WSGI.
More information about the Web-SIG