[Web-SIG] about the status line in WSGI
graham.dumpleton at gmail.com
Sat Oct 20 11:24:56 CEST 2007
FWIW, I have seen people want to use (mod_python didn't support it
though), the description associated with a status so they could use
different values for a 200 response as part of some strange web
application testing framework.
On 20/10/2007, Manlio Perillo <manlio_perillo at libero.it> wrote:
> Robert Brewer ha scritto:
> > Manlio Perillo wrote:
> >> Is a WSGI gateway allowed to ignore the Reason-Phrase part of the
> >> status line returned by the WSGI application, and to use a server
> >> defined phrase?
> > I would be sad if a WSGI gateway did that to me.
> > Why deny a web
> > application developer the right to control that part of the output?
> The WSGI spec requires a full status line as a simplification for the
> WSGI Gateway and not to give more control to WSGI applications.
> Regards Manlio Perillo
> Web-SIG mailing list
> Web-SIG at python.org
> Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/graham.dumpleton%40gmail.com
More information about the Web-SIG