[Web-SIG] Time a for JSON parser in the standard library?

[Graham Dumpleton]

On 11/03/2008, Alan Kennedy <pywebsig at xhaus.com> wrote:
> [Graham]
>
> >  The problem areas were, different interpretations of what could be
>  >  supplied in an error response. Whether an integer, string or arbitrary
>  >  object could be supplied as the id attribute in a request. Finally,
>  >  some JavaScript clients would only work with a server side
>  >  implementation which provided introspection methods as they would
>  >  dynamically create a JavaScript proxy object based on a call of the
>  >  introspection methods.
>
>
> These are JSON-RPC concerns, and nothing to do with JSON text de/serialization.
>
>  I do believe we're only discussing JSON<->python objects
>  transformation, in this thread at least.

Okay. No problem then. :-)

Graham

>  >  Unfortunately the JSON 1.1 draft specification didn't necessarily make
>  >  things better.
>
>
> There is no JSON 1.1 spec; but there is a JSON-RPC 1.1 spec.
>
>  http://json-rpc.org/wiki/specification
>
>
>  >  Thus my question is, what version of the JSON specification are you
>  >  intending to support.
>
>
> The one specified in RFC 4627
>
>  http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt
>
>  Regards,
>
>
>  Alan.
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Web-SIG mailing list
>  Web-SIG at python.org
>  Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
>  Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/graham.dumpleton%40gmail.com
>