[Web-SIG] Proposed WSGI extensions for asynchronous servers
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Mon May 12 03:09:41 CEST 2008
At 08:25 PM 5/11/2008 -0400, Christopher Stawarz wrote:
>Given that the semantics of wsgi.input are, in general, incompatible
>with non-blocking execution, I'm inclined to think that such
>middleware would either need to be rewritten to use x-
>wsgiorg.async.input, or just couldn't be used with asynchronous
>servers. But I'll think about it some more -- maybe there's a way to
>make this work.
the lowdown on this. It's only seven paragraphs, but it already
covers this ground thoroughly.
>middleware allowed to replace environ with another dict instance
>before passing it to the application?
See the same seven paragraphs for the answer to this as well (albeit
More information about the Web-SIG