[Web-SIG] Announcing bobo

[Brian Sutherland]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:42:32AM +0300, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
> But let's go back to bobo, I can see how URL paths derived from file
> and function names are nice and make sense, but I'm not as thrilled
> with declaring the app path in a decorator. When looking at it from
> the perspective of "caller defines when and how the subroutine is
> called" I see that the entire (and very useful) level of abstraction
> is gone -- the application path is defined right where the application
> itself is defined. It's almost like declaring a piece of code and
> saying "just inject this into file X at line Y" -- not pretty.
> However, I have to admit, that if taken as an iterative improvement
> over file/function name it looks very reasonable.

Seems like this style of declaring routes may be more like what you
want:

    http://bobo.digicool.com/more.html#configured-routes

-- 
Brian Sutherland