[Web-SIG] Future of WSGI

[P.J. Eby]

At 11:42 AM 11/25/2009 +0000, Chris Dent wrote:
>On start_response, I find that I can mess with it (replacing it with
>something else, usually) before I go deeper into a stack of WSGI
>applications is sometimes useful, so I would be disappointed if I lost
>that option.

Note that in the WSGI 2 calling protocol, you would simply modify 
your return values, rather than needing to create a function and pass 
it down the call chain.