[Web-SIG] PEP 0333 and PEP XXXX Updated

[P.J. Eby]

At 08:48 AM 9/20/2009 -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote:
>Good plan but I'm afraid now only a bunch of elite people on this list
>is going to remember all the details on theses "upcoming"
>specifications. Why the rush to specify WSGI 3.0 and not focus
>mainly on the next one ahead ?

Because having more versions of the spec is a bug, not a 
feature.  How many versions will a server or framework be reasonably 
expected to support?

Also, note that changing the calling convention ensures that you 
can't accidentally run an old application with a server that will be 
sending it different information than it expects.  This ensures that 
we can have clean boundary conditions between spec versions, and can 
hopefully just have a few, well-tested and battle-hardened converters.