[Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?
pje at telecommunity.com
Fri Oct 22 02:16:57 CEST 2010
At 10:35 AM 10/22/2010 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>Any one care to comment on my blog post?
>As far as web framework developers commenting, Armin at:
> """Hopefully not. WSGI could do better and there is a proposal for
>So, looks he is very cool on the idea.
>No other developers of actual web frameworks has commented at all on
>PEP 3333 from what I can see.
Just out of curiosity, Graham, isn't PEP 3333 basically only a slight
modification to what you yourself proposed and implemented in
mod_wsgi for Python 3?
My guess is that there's been no comment because there's really not
much to say about it. The most controversial thing about it was
Python-Dev's objection to modifying PEP 333 in place -- and that's
the *only* reason why it's a new PEP at all.
(Indeed, I originally just made the discussed amendments to PEP 333,
and specifically wanted to avoid having a new PEP number in order to
create unnecessary additional discussion or questions.)
More information about the Web-SIG