[Web-SIG] PEP 444 (aka Web3)

P.J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Sat Sep 18 18:30:36 CEST 2010

At 09:01 AM 9/18/2010 -0700, Robert Brewer wrote:
>Marcel Hellkamp wrote:
> >
> > Removing any support for this type of asynchronism would render web3
> > useless for all but completely synchronous and trivial applications.
> > Even frameworks would have no way to work around this anymore.
>I've run a few businesses now on WSGI without doing what you 
>describe, so I don't see why blocking makes an application 'trivial'.

I believe he means:  all_but(synchronous_apps + trivial_apps), not 
all_but(apps(synchronous & trivial)).  ;-)

(That being said, for WSGI 2 I still want to get rid of 
start_response.  IMO, async WSGI needs to be a different protocol.) 

More information about the Web-SIG mailing list