[Web-SIG] PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0

[P.J. Eby]

At 05:04 PM 1/2/2011 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>That PEP was rejected in the end and was
>replaced with PEP 342 which worked quite differently, yet I cant see
>that the WSGI specification was revisited in light of how it ended up
>being implemented and the implications of that.

Part of my contribution to PEP 342 was ensuring that it was 
sufficiently PEP 325-compatible to ensure that PEP 333 wouldn't 
*need* revisiting.  At least, not with respect to generator close() 
methods anyway.  ;-)