[Web-SIG] CGI in PEP 444
hidura at gmail.com
hidura at gmail.com
Tue Jan 4 18:57:17 CET 2011
> CGI is by far the quickest and easiest way to write and deploy very
> simple web site scripts. As you move to improve Python for important
> industrial strength web programming, why not also continue to support
> quick and dirty web interactivity scripts?
Because CGI is an old fashion way to make the things and is very different
from the strength web programming. I don't say that we have to abandon the
easy way but wsgi provides an easy way to work and with the PEP-3333 will
be able in Py3k so CGI will be no useless.
El , Ron Stephens <rdsteph at mac.com> escribió:
> CGI is by far the quickest and easiest way to write and deploy very
> simple web site scripts. As you move to improve Python for important
> industrial strength web programming, why not also continue to support
> quick and dirty web interactivity scripts?
> Ron Stephens
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 7:53 AM, "PJ Eby" pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> > At 12:43 PM 1/4/2011 +0000, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >> Alice Bevan McGregor writes: > > [1] http:://bit.ly/e7rtI6 So, while
> we are at it, could we get rid of the "CGI server example" in this new
> SWGI spec? This is 2011, and we should promote modern idioms, not
> encourage people to do 1995 Web programming. 10 years ago, CGI was
> already frown upon. (and even the idea that WSGI should provide some kind
> of CGI compatibility sounds a bit ridiculous to me) Regards Antoine.
> >
> > I still use CGI for the odd one-off, testing, prototyping, etc., and
> it's by far the easiest thing to deploy on a lot of web hosts. Hell, even
> Google App Engine *emulates* CGI in its default deployment configuration,
> IIRC. So it's not exactly obsolete.
> >
> > Also, the main purpose of the example is to show what a web server
> developer needs to do to hook up their own piping to provide WSGI
> services... and most web server developers have something like CGI code
> already lying around, or at least know what CGI looks like.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list
> Web-SIG at python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/pje%40telecommunity.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Web-SIG mailing list
> > Web-SIG at python.org
> > Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> > Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/rdsteph%40mac.com
> _______________________________________________
> Web-SIG mailing list
> Web-SIG at python.org
> Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/hidura%40gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/attachments/20110104/b681227e/attachment.html>
More information about the Web-SIG
mailing list