[Web-SIG] Server-side async API implementation sketches

[Alice Bevan–McGregor]

On 2011-01-08 13:16:52 -0800, P.J. Eby said:

> In the limit case, it appears that any WSGI 1 server could provide an 
> (emulated) async WSGI2 implementation, simply by wrapping WSGI2 apps 
> with a finished version of the decorator in my sketch.
> 
> Or, since users could do it themselves, this would mean that WSGI2 
> deployment wouldn't be dependent on all server implementers immediately 
> turning out their own WSGI2 implementations.

This, if you'll pardon my language, is bloody awesome.  :D  That would 
strongly drive adoption of WSGI2.  Note that adapting a WSGI1 
application to WSGI2 server would likewise be very handy, and I 
suspect, even easier to implement.

	- Alice.