[Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest

Benoit Chesneau bchesneau at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 04:29:27 EST 2016

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:19 AM Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augustin at polytechnique.org> wrote:

> Hello Benoît,
> Thanks for clarifying that you also had the reverse problem in mind,
> headers sent by applications. This side is less problematic in the sense
> that application authors can adapt to stronger requirements.
> In general this is a bit of a mess due to differences between what the RFC
> 2616 says and what browsers do in practice. That’s why I believe the
> pragmatic solution is to exchange bytes. (This isn’t a major issue in the
> grand scheme of things anyway.)
> Best regards,
> --
> Aymeric.
Since sockets are only accepting bytes in python 3.x,  having everything as
bytes would also allow the server to process the response more easily...

- benoît
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/attachments/20160106/9666c7c9/attachment.html>

More information about the Web-SIG mailing list