[XML-SIG] Useless fun thing for XML - comments or helpers?
Lars Marius Garshol
Thu, 03 Sep 1998 16:57:41 +0200
* Fredrik Lundh
>Note that nodes can contain other nodes (bookmarks and nodes are
>mixed in the order they are found), and the top node doesn't have
>a name element. Let's see... Is the following valid syntax?
> <!ELEMENT NODE (NAME?, (BOOKMARK|NODE)+)>
Yes, but I'm a bit uneasy about making NAME optional. Maybe we should
have a separate element for the top NODE?
><!ELEMENT BOOKMARK (NAME, URL, ADDED?, VISITED?, MODIFIED?)>
Looks good to me; Opera has CREATED and VISITED.
>(where dates are stored according to http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
>or RFC1766 or something -- is there a "defacto standard" for dates in XML?)
Not at present, but ISO 8601 looks like a likely candidate. I think the
19980902 variant of ISO 8601 is the best one.