Fred L. Drake Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@acm.org
Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:21:34 -0400 (EDT)

Paul Prescod writes:
 > If we take out parent and sibling pointers, I see know reason that a DOM
 > implementation should be more than a few percent slower than qp_xml. In

  I'd like to see the parent pointer kept, but I'm also fine with an
explicit destroy() or close() method instead of those damnable
  I haven't actually needed sibling pointers, so I'm not sure I care
about them.  They can be computed easily enough if someone wants the
data on an "occaisional" basis.


Fred L. Drake, Jr.	     <fdrake@acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives