[XML-SIG] SAX for 1.6

Paul Prescod paul@prescod.net
Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:17:14 -0500

My opinion is that a simple SAX 2 API would have a 90% chance of being
in-line with the final SAX 2 because AFAIK, it hasn't been changing very
much for the last six months. It's just a matter of finishing touches.
Officially it is in "beta" so major changes would be surprising.

A SAX 1 API would have an 100% chance of being out of date by the end of
the year, though. Therefore I think we should go with SAX2. Also, there
is no requirement to support all of SAX2 in the core implementation.
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for himself
"Ivory towers are no longer in order. We need ivory 
networks. Today, sitting quietly and thinking is the 
world's greatest generator of wealth and prosperity."
 - http://www.bespoke.org/viridian/print.asp?t=140