[XML-SIG] SAX for 1.6

Fred L. Drake, Jr. fdrake@acm.org
Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:14:14 -0400 (EDT)

Lars Marius Garshol writes:
 > This is more or less the same response I got from David Megginson.
 > Also, the most controversial parts (DTD declarations and lexical
 > events) have been moved out into an extension package.
 > So I would say that we should put the core SAX2 stuff in the Python
 > 1.6 distribution, and then put the extension stuff with more drivers
 > in the XML-SIG package.

  This is great news, especicially considering Paul's comments
regarding the expected lifetimes of the two APIs.

  +1 on using SAX2's final definition.
  -0 on using a "convenient" subset of SAX2.


Fred L. Drake, Jr.	  <fdrake at acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives