[XML-SIG] SAX for 1.6
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:14:14 -0400 (EDT)
Lars Marius Garshol writes:
> This is more or less the same response I got from David Megginson.
> Also, the most controversial parts (DTD declarations and lexical
> events) have been moved out into an extension package.
> So I would say that we should put the core SAX2 stuff in the Python
> 1.6 distribution, and then put the extension stuff with more drivers
> in the XML-SIG package.
This is great news, especicially considering Paul's comments
regarding the expected lifetimes of the two APIs.
+1 on using SAX2's final definition.
-0 on using a "convenient" subset of SAX2.
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives