[XML-SIG] XPath in Python 2
Dieter Maurer
dieter@handshake.de
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:49:07 +0200 (CEST)
Paul Prescod writes:
> Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > > 4XPath is cleaner from a user's point of view, but it requires a lot bit
> > > of C/lex code for parsing the XPaths. I don't know if we would have to
> > > go back to the BDFL to get permission for that code to go into Python.
> >
> > Would it be good enough for us just to check in ANSI C code from FLEX/Bison?
>
> I'm not sure that Guido would go for that because it means that everyone
> must go back to you for changes, right?
The usual approach is to have generated C sources
*and* the flex/bison sources.
Thus, if someone wants to change at that level (few will),
they will need a C development system. With that, they
can easily build flex and bison as well.
Dieter