[XML-SIG] Re: [DO-SIG] Python language bidning January 2000 Draft
Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:49:47 -0400
Mike Olson wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
> > Of course, another solution would be to ignore the fact that
> > DOM is specifed in IDL and provide a CORBA-independent DOM API.
> Why not just discourage the use of the accessor and mutator functions
> for the python mapping and say that attribute access should be done
> through the attribute.
Then you advocate abandoning the CORBA IDL mapping for Python.
The Python mapping does *not* provide for using IDL attributes
as Python attributes. In fact, some folks in the DO-SIG seem to
feel strongly that doing so would be a really bad idea.
> Lets leave it up to implementors to determine
> how they want to spell the functions. After all, these functions really
> are "private".
No, they aren't private, or at least, they aren't private if you
follow the IDL mapping.
Jim Fulton mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org Python Powered!
Technical Director (888) 344-4332 http://www.python.org
Digital Creations http://www.digicool.com http://www.zope.org
Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission. Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for