[XML-SIG] Re: [DO-SIG] Python language bidning January 2000 Draft

Robin Becker robin@jessikat.co.uk
Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:21:58 +0100

In article <200006270028.SAA02708@localhost.localdomain>, Uche Ogbuji
<uogbuji@fourthought.com> writes
>Jim Fulton:
>> Then you advocate abandoning the CORBA IDL mapping for Python.
>> The Python mapping does *not* provide for using IDL attributes
>> as Python attributes. In fact, some folks in the DO-SIG seem to
>> feel strongly that doing so would be a really bad idea.
>I think that since the end aim is for maximum Pythonicity independent of 
>CORBA, that we should, as Mike suggests, just do away with accessor/mutators 
>So that would be my vote: The Python/DOM binding for DOM is to access DOM 
>attributes through Python attributes.
moi aussi
Robin Becker