[XML-SIG] How to get 4DOM to output empty <elements />
Norman Walsh
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
09 May 2000 09:10:29 -0400
/ Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh wrote:
| > / Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> was heard to say:
| > | He said XHTML not XML, a standard supposed to be bacwards compatible.
| >
| > I understand that, but it's also supposed to be XML. The most emphatic
| > thing that the XHTML spec could say is that one form or the other is
| > preferred. XHTML has to obey the rules of XML.
|
| My understanding was that XHTML was supposed to define a subset of XML
| that is also HTML (and actually accepted and rendered more-or-less ok).
|
| It is always hard to tell what a recommendation in a "standard" means.
Yep. FWIW, if my concern is for presentation rather than
compliance with the standard, I usually just add a bogus
attribute:
<br browserhack="html"/>
That works just as well as "<br />" and is often easier to get
tools to render.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Our years, our debts, and our enemies
http://nwalsh.com/ | are always more numerous than we
| imagine.--Charles Nodier