[XML-SIG] Re: How to proceed

Lars Marius Garshol larsga@garshol.priv.no
24 Oct 2000 13:50:21 +0200

* Lars Marius Garshol
| The only reason I can see for not including xmlproc is that I would
| like to be able to basically develop it the way I want, and add
| whatever features I like and at my own speed.  If you think that
| would work just as well under the XML-SIG umbrella then I think we
| can do that.

* Martin v. Loewis
| Yes, certainly. As long as you continue to maintain it, I assume you
| will also respond to people who complain that something broke. 

Of course.

| With different people contributing experimental bleeding-edge code,
| I would expect many releases to have glitches here and there - if we
| all agree to work towards a "stable" release from time to time, then
| the better.

Then I think we've settled that.  Once I replace my monitor I will
commit the xmlproc regression tests to the PyXML CVS tree and start
developing it there.

The question of rsskit and dtddoc still remains open, though.

--Lars M.