[XML-SIG] Re: How to proceed

Lars Marius Garshol larsga@garshol.priv.no
24 Oct 2000 15:54:13 +0200

* Lars Marius Garshol
| I think we should use a different module, possibly even a different
| package. Would xml.saxkit.* work? Or xml.saxexts.*? Or xml.saxpack.*?

* Fred L. Drake, Jr.
| How about xml.saxtools.*?

I like that better than my own suggestions, since it makes it clearer
what the package actually is.  Unless anyone protests or proposes a
better name, that's the one I would like to use.

Does this belong in the XML-SIG package?  I think it does, but it
would be nice to have feedback.

--Lars M.