[XML-SIG] Dropping xml.marshal

[Fred L. Drake, Jr.]

Andrew Kuchling writes:
 > The code in the xml.marshal package is out of date, and I've never
 > heard of anyone using it.  Therefore, I suggest it be deleted.  
 > Any objections?

  Given the recent discussion on the XML-RPC list, and the
availability of xmlrpclib, I'd say that certainly xml.marshal.xmlrpc
can go.  I don't have any opinion on the others, but see no reason to
keep them if they aren't being used.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation