[XML-SIG] WSDL library ?
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 03:21:48 -0500
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:31:29PM -0700, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > > I will be extremely disappointed if WSDL 1.1 is made SOAP only.
> > Don't worry, I expect to lose that battle.
> It looks as if you should have made it to SPAM10 for the Web services panel.
> You would have been the only one with any decent amount of good things to say
> about SOAP ;-)
> Pretty scary when I'd be more comfortable pointing people to a hack like
> XML-RPC than I would be pointing people to SOAP.
Fits the 80%/20% rule perfectly. Less than 5 pages and easy to implement
reliably. For the people in that 80% pool it's simply the best solution.
The only problem is being able to cache calls without side-effects, but
it's a scaling issue, and that minimal addition could probably be
standardized on top the core (like HTTP/1.1 vs HTTP/1.0 initial goal).
> [ Wow. And I tried to make a conscious effort not to rant ;-) ]
ranting ? nahhh
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
email@example.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/