[XML-SIG] Re: Ideas for web/ package

[M.-A. Lemburg]

Walter D=F6rwald wrote:
>=20
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>  > Seriously, mxURL will slowly move towards RFC 2396 and
>  > so the answer is "yes, but...".
>=20
> What I'd like to have is an RFC2396 compliant URL class,
> that has all the url components as assignable properties,
> ...

mxURL provides an immutable type, so assigment to attributes
is not possible. However, you can use an existing URL object
to construct a new one out of it: the .rebuild() method
allows to do this.

Something I might add in the future is support for what
you've called path_segments (with the possibility to assign
parameters to all path segments, not just the last one as
is currently implemented in mxURL). I've never actually seen=20
it in use on web-pages and didn't even know about this
possibility when I wrote mxURL.

--=20
Marc-Andre Lemburg
CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH
______________________________________________________________________
Company & Consulting:                           http://www.egenix.com/
Python Software:                   http://www.egenix.com/files/python/