[XML-SIG] DOMImplementation.createDocumentType

[Alexandre]

On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 08:40:09AM -0600, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > The question is: what's the right way of doing things. Is it OK to
> > change XmlDomGenerator to use an empty string, or would this break
> > existing code? Or should cDomlette be enhanced to accept None as the
> > publicId?
> 
> I think this calls for a discussion, and then for us to make all DOMs 
> compliant.
> 
> I think that thought it's not quite the same situation (not sure what the 
> status of empty string is in FPI spec), for consistency and least surprise, we 
> should specify None to mean "no pubid", not empty string.

I agree

> If people agree, I can amend cDomlette.

+1

Alexandre Fayolle
-- 
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com   http://www.logilab.fr  http://www.logilab.org
Narval, the first software agent available as free software (GPL).