[XML-SIG] Re: Issues with Unicode type

[Martin v. Loewis]

Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> writes:

>   No it's not it's a well formed document. Strictly speaking you have
> either well formed or not, there is not other definition, and that definition
> is given in the XML specification.

It's ill-formed: it contains illegal characters, according to section
2.2 of http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006:

"Legal characters are tab, carriage return, line feed, and the legal
characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646. "

The cited version of the standard is both the 1993 revision, and part
1 of the 2000 revision; both revisions have legal characters in the
BMP only.

Regards,
Martin