[XML-SIG] Re: Issues with Unicode type

[Daniel Veillard]

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:40:36AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com> writes:
> > Having said all this, Martin is right about XML and the BMP.  I'd
> > forgotten.
> 
> Actually, I now think that the XML spec is inconsistent. In one place,
> it allows non-BMP references; in another place, it points to
> specifications that restrict themselves to the BMP.

  if you read the full paragraph and don't stop at the sentence
referencing the Unicode spec I think it is relatively clear. You could
ask xml-dev or the xml-editor list if you really think there is a risk
of confusion there but this was carefully crafted to avoid confusion
precisely.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/