[XML-SIG] Finding _xmlplus in Python 2.3a2
Martin v. L÷wis
04 Mar 2003 08:00:51 +0100
John J Lee <email@example.com> writes:
> When I use a Python core module, and then install a related third-party
> module (no matter if it's written by the same people, and/or covers very
> similar ground), I don't expect it to clobber the first module unless I
> explicitly ask for that (by using try / except, or manipulating sys.path
> and the module system myself). I expect it not to even touch the first
> module, actually. And I would be correct, for all cases EXCEPT PyXML.
No, you wouldn't. There are many cases where installing a new Python
package can modify the behaviour of existing Python modules:
1. Any package can install a .pth file, extending sys.path. This, in
turn, can cause imports to be resolved in a different way. For this
change in behaviour, you don't even have to *use* the installed
2. A module can install additional codecs, causing changes in
behaviour to unicode_string.encode(), and codecs.lookup().
3. A module can register things in copy_reg, causing changes in
behaviour to the pickle, cPickle, and copy modules.
There are probably more examples, but this "silently augment" approach
is wide-spread in Python (and, indeed, in the world of computing: any
kind of plug-in, by nature, silently extends the behaviour of the
application it is plugged into).