[XML-SIG] XBEL / Call for extension
Uche.Ogbuji at fourthought.com
Fri Jan 28 17:34:29 CET 2005
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:21 +0000, Frans Englich wrote:
> On Friday 28 January 2005 15:57, Christian Junk wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 28. Januar 2005 16:46 schrieb Uche Ogbuji:
> > > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:44 +0100, Christian Junk wrote:
> > > > Perhaps we should think of using XML Scheme instead of DTD?
> > >
> > > RELAX NG, please.
> > So, don't you like XML Scheme?
> FWIW; I think Uche is right, RELAX NG is better, at least because it allows
> more fine grained specification. You can convert RNG to WXS with trang, so if
> the specification is the expressed in RNG it doesn't exclude the latter.
> But XBEL would still be namespace less? Or what is people's thoughts on that?
Well, my inclination would be to keep it namespace-free. The nice thing
about keeping it namespace-free is that it helps keep processing simple.
Namespaces are a simple idea that inject a ridiculous amount of
complexity in practice. I'm always happier when I can process XML
If anyone does call for XBEL to define a namespace, what is your
specific use case that compels it?
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Use CSS to display XML - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/x-dw-x-xmlcss-i.html
Introducing the Amara XML Toolkit - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/01/19/amara.html
Be humble, not imperial (in design) - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=10286
UBL 1.0 - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think28.html
Manage XML collections with XAPI - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-xapi.html
Default and error handling in XSLT lookup tables - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tiplook.html
Packaging XSLT lookup tables as EXSLT functions - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tiplook2.html
More information about the XML-SIG