Hi folks, I've just noticed that a legacy piece of code I'm working with contains the following pattern: class SomeClass(object): __all__ = ['add', 'delete'] def __init__(self): pass def get(self): pass def add(self, x): pass def delete(self, x): pass And the caller of this class actually uses the .get() method. I have this in at least 10 different places. I wasn't able to find any information about __all__ having any special meaning when defined inside a class so this looks like a mistake. Q1: Do we want pylint to warn about __all__ being detected not at module level ? Q2: Do we want another check to warn about class attributes staring with single/double underscore ? -- Alex