6 Feb
2013
6 Feb
'13
4:01 p.m.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Donald Stufft <donald.stufft@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM, a.cavallo@cavallinux.eu wrote:
Or until when somebody will explain if X.Y.devN comes before of after X.Y.N...
Easy, before.
Which is explained in the PEP pretty clearly I thought. But if you're still not sure there were lengthy discussions on this very mailing list that led to that decision. For what it's worth, there were people who argued the opposite too, but eventually it seems like a consensus was reached.