On 21 October 2017 at 18:21, Nick Coghlan firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 21 October 2017 at 18:04, Wes Turner email@example.com wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2017, Nick Coghlan firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I'm also going to file an issue on the setuptools issue tracker to make
sure Jason is aware of what we're doing, and get his explicit OK with the idea of making the format a PyPA interoperability specification (if he isn't, we'll demote Thomas's document to being a guide for tool developers aiming for pkg_resources interoperability).
What are the URIs for this PR and issue?
New setuptools issue: https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/1179 (I hadn't filed it yet when I wrote the previous comment) Thomas's PR: https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/pull/390
With Jason's +1 on the setuptools issue, I've gone ahead and hit the merge button on Thomas's PR: https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/commit/34c37f0e66821127a...
The spec is now available here https://packaging.python.org/specifications/entry-points/, and clarifications and corrections can be submitted as follow-up PRs (as for other PyPA specifications).