7 Nov
2013
7 Nov
'13
10:27 p.m.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:12 PM, J. Trent Adams jtrentadams@gmail.com wrote:
should provide an option to participate in as secure communication as possible.
Randomly applying security distinctions, to RFC de'jour, is not really helping. If you want true message security, then PGP/GPG is the only universal way. If you are just looking to protect the integrity of the pathway, might I suggest that a wrapper around 2 different technologies (one being header reliability and the other being source reliability) is just that... a wrapper (or as I say, a panacea). If you truly wanted secure comms, DMARC would be mandating PGP and going after MUAs.... but I digress.
-Jim P.