At 05:34 PM 11/7/02 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
"RJ" == Ron Jarrell <jarrell@vt.edu> writes:
RJ> I'd file a bug report on this, but I'm on my out the door and RJ> won't be online the rest of the night, and will likely forget RJ> about it until the next time I look at the errorlog... This is RJ> after applying updates *yesterday*, although nothing checked RJ> in so far today would seem to apply.. Only happened once, RJ> although plenty of messages have gone through different lists RJ> that would have archived.
Okay, I just checked in some fixes for this, I believe. See the bin/b4b5-archfix script. Do a normal update then run this as specified in the docstring (use --help for details).
I've done a little testing with this but will verify with more lists momentarily.
Hey, Barry, or did your testing not include actually *doing* a -h? :-)
Given that it causes a traceback, because b4b5-archfix is missing a from Mailman.i18n import _