Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org> wrote, inter alia:
- Moderated-edit. I'm running Mailman on a couple of boxes but I
There is kludgey support for this now, that most people are probably not aware of: in the admindb interface, you forward the message to yourself. Then you use whatever tools you want to edit the message and resend it back to the list with the Approved header. Then you delete the message from the admindb. Not exactly the most efficient workflow. ;)
Ah, that's it. And what is the Approved header like? Can't find it in the www.lists.org documentation. Currently waiting to see whether List-Approved: <a moderator address> works.
Well, it wasn't a *bad* guess... but it was wrong, in that the message still came up requiring moderation.
The thing that's always held me back here is designing a useable u/i to such a feature. Actually doing the editing probably isn't difficult, but I'm far from a web u/i expert. Doing it in a way that won't get clobbered by huge messages, be vulnerable to cross-site scripting or other security issues, and that provides a natural editing interface, is a big task. I wish there was some free tool we could just bolt on to do this -- I'm wondering if something like SquirrelMail could be appropriated for the task?
Wouldn't it be enough to offer editing in the standard TEXTAREA, having first checked that the message isn't stupidly large?
Then users who sent stupidly large messages that needed editing, or non-plain-text attachments that needed editing, would simply get them bounced. And then they might get to grasp the virtues of plain text and brevity. Which would be a Good Thing.
(List I moderate have a max message size of 10k and no attachments. More than that is too much to be skimming.)
I've briefly tried and failed to think of an exploit that works in a TEXTAREA. Someone will be along in a moment to correct me.
Mike