Happy Holidays

Just catching up on some of the archives so forgive my belated response. I use and would like to see the patches integrated in 2.1 I think it's very usefulI. I maintain a fairly active server with ~500 (and growing) lists at UCI.

My two cents Con Wieland University of California at Irvine

At 3:57 AM -0800 11/30/01, Richard Barrett wrote:

Having posted Mailman-htdig integration patches on sourceforge and subsequently maintained them I am interested in finding out how many sites have adopted the patches and want to continue using them. The patches I'm referring to are:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=444879&group_id=103&at id=300103

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=444884&group_id=103&at id=300103

and their earlier incarnations 401669/401670:

I'm asking for two reasons:

1. to gauge the likely demand for MM 2.1 compatible version of the patch and how urgently it is needed. btw: I've got a MM 2.1a3 compatible version of the patches about to be tested and hope to post them on sourceforge next week.

2. to see if there is sufficient demand for the patch being integrated with the main development trunk of MM. If enough users say they want it then presumably the primary MM developers will consider a request to fold the patch into the main development line post the MM 2.1 release. My motives here are fairly selfish in that I'd like to avoid having to redevelop and test the patch again for the next major MM release after 2.1

Reply off list would probably be appropriate. I will collate the responses and post to the list a summary of the interest expressed.

Thanks

Richard

---

Mailman-Users maillist - Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users