Thank you Juan, I've just joined GitHub and I've submitted the description of the bug. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni.soma@gmail.com> wrote:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues
From: John Ladasky <jladasky@itu.edu> <jladasky@itu.edu> Reply: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> Date: 20 July 2016 at 7:49:10 AM To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy set_printoptions, silent failure, bug?
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your reply. If no one disagrees with you or with me that this is a Numpy bug, I would appreciate being directed to the appropriate page to submit a bug-fix request.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:41 PM, John Ladasky <jladasky@itu.edu> wrote:
Should this be considered a Numpy bug, or is there some reason that set_printoptions would legitimately need to accept a dictionary as a single argument?
There is no such reason. One could certainly add more validation to the arguments to np.set_printoptions().
-- Robert Kern
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
-- *John J. Ladasky Jr., Ph.D.* *Research Scientist* *International Technological University* *2711 N. First St, San Jose, CA 95134 USA* _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
-- *John J. Ladasky Jr., Ph.D.* *Research Scientist* *International Technological University* *2711 N. First St, San Jose, CA 95134 USA*