On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 5:01 PM Matthew Brett <matthew.brett@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Updated for Numpy wheels only - BigQuery [1], Notebook [2].
41% of 32-bit wheels need manylinux1, 30% of 64-bit wheels.
Thanks for doing the analysis, very useful data.
Ralf - agreed we shouldn't wait too long for old pip - but maybe we need to think of some way of reminding people with old pip to upgrade?
I don't think there's much we can do unfortunately. That's up to Pip itself, and it may have good reasons not to nag people to upgrade. Cheers, Ralf
Cheers,
Matthew
[1] https://gist.github.com/dc410698ca9e422aec08e4554eac6678 [2] https://gist.github.com/77879cb58b28b3d05c3c14b8a45687e8
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Matthew Brett <matthew.brett@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:51 PM Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
The 32 bit manylinux1 wheels are proving problematic, see
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/17174. One proposed solution is to only release manylinux2010 linux wheels for the NumPy 1.20 release. Thoughts?
I think it may still be too early to discontinue manylinux1, sadly.
Systems requiring manylinux1 are those with:
pip < 19.0 (Jan 2019) [1] Linux distribution older than around 2010 (glibc < 2.12) [2]
I did a PyPI BigQuery [3] just now, editing to give results for 32, and 64 bit (by changing the manylinux wheel name matching regexp).
Then I processed a bit with Pandas [4].
It looks like about 34% of PyPI manylinux*_i686 downloads are for systems that actually need manylinux1, and about 17% of manylinux*_x86_64. See the table in [4] for a listing of the top 10 entries.
Cheers,
Matthew
[1] https://github.com/pypa/manylinux [2] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0571/ [3] https://gist.github.com/e3901b344b8d81f5633908347b1b333e [4] https://gist.github.com/0f624ddbc34bc3db8bcae23e3eeb7b54
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion