I will try to put a note in the transpose section if there isn't one there already. As noted, there are numerous reference-instead-of-a-copy returns in Numeric which reflect the speed rather than safety orientation of the original designer. Many complaints of this nature are a complaint about that choice, which made a package that was harder to understand and more difficult to use safely but which is about as fast as possible. I didn't like some of these choices but then again I didn't do the work. -----Original Message----- From: numpy-discussion-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:numpy-discussion-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Tim Hochberg Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 1:35 PM To: numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Re: Numeric.transpose (incorrect documentation) "Curtis Jensen" <cjensen@bioeng.ucsd.edu> wrote in message news:3B6076D4.68B6840C@bioeng.ucsd.edu...
the documenation for the "transpose" function for the "Numeric" module seems to be incoorect, or at least missleading.
The correct place for this is probably the numpy-discussion list, so I'm cc'ing it there. Perhaps the Paul Dubois will see it and have some ideas for clearing of the docs.